As
we know up to now King Dasis Ravana was not a thief/ratio as
Ramayanaya tells us.It means there is a conspiracy between those
stories.What we had to think is this battle conducted to overthrow the
King Ravana from his crown & distroy the great civilization.To
do this they attach sitha role in to this and change the real story
behind this so as far as we concern King Ravana was the real
Hero..............
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Ramayana the struggle of White against Black
They were in colour and complexion black opposed to the Aryans, who were bright or fair in colour and features. It (the Ramayana) represents the Rakshas as black of hue, and compares them with black cloudier and masses of black collyrium, it attributes to them curly wooly hair and thick lips, it depicts them as Loaded with chains, collars and girdle of gold and the other bright ornaments which their race has always loved and in which the kindred races of the southern still delight.
Rama went to forest for 14 years to destroy the Adivasis. He had preferred killing of Adivasis to the pleasures of king's palace. All those killed in Ramayana war were black Rakshasas and Vanaras, and not a single white Aryan was killed. All this proves that the struggle depicted in Ramayana was a struggle between White coloured Aryans crusading against the Black Adivasis and in the real sense was a struggle betweenBlacks and Whites.
Rama went to forest for 14 years to destroy the Adivasis. He had preferred killing of Adivasis to the pleasures of king's palace. All those killed in Ramayana war were black Rakshasas and Vanaras, and not a single white Aryan was killed. All this proves that the struggle depicted in Ramayana was a struggle between White coloured Aryans crusading against the Black Adivasis and in the real sense was a struggle betweenBlacks and Whites.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Revange against Ravana Kingdom
The black beauty "Shoorpanakha" (King Ravana's sister) was insulted by Rama and Lakshmana. To her proposal of marriage, why did they not tell her that they were already married, why was she disfigured? The real reason of this was that Ravana had accepted Buddhist philosophy of nonviolence and opposed the killing of animals in Yajnyas. To revenge this Rama cut the nose and ears of Shoorpanakha who was much more beautiful than Sita herself.
No brother would have tolerated the torture of Shoorpanakha Ravana took away Sita to question Rama in her presence. At the time of "Swayamwara" of Sita Ravana was already known to Rama but still Rama kept on searching him. It appears therefore that to liberate Sita was his secondary aim and the main aim was to destroy the culture of non violence of Ravana.
Ravana kept Sita very respectfully in the Ashoka Watika and treated her with great respect as a guest and followed political protocol. He never tried to outrage her modesty or to rape her.
No brother would have tolerated the torture of Shoorpanakha Ravana took away Sita to question Rama in her presence. At the time of "Swayamwara" of Sita Ravana was already known to Rama but still Rama kept on searching him. It appears therefore that to liberate Sita was his secondary aim and the main aim was to destroy the culture of non violence of Ravana.
Ravana kept Sita very respectfully in the Ashoka Watika and treated her with great respect as a guest and followed political protocol. He never tried to outrage her modesty or to rape her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)